Search This Blog

Showing posts with label liquid dietary supplements. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liquid dietary supplements. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Recent FDA Guidance on Beverages, Liquid Supplements & Their Ingredients



In mid-January FDA issued two important guidance documents, Distinguishing Liquid Dietary Supplements from Beverages (http://tinyurl.com/m443cla) and Considerations Regarding Substances Added to Foods, Including Beverages and Dietary Supplements (http://tinyurl.com/nhwqz26).  I will discuss the guidances in detail below but will start with the parts that are particularly interesting:

First, in addition to outlining the attributes that FDA will consider when determining whether a product is classified as a beverage or a liquid dietary supplement, the guidance on distinguishing beverages and dietary supplements also provides some interesting comments on the types of claims that may be used on beverage labels. The guidance notes that in addition to authorized health and nutrient content claims, certain structure function claims may also be made about conventional beverages.  However, FDA reminds the reader that structure function claims on foods and beverages are only permissible when the claimed effect derives from “the product’s character as a food—its taste, aroma or nutritive value.” The document goes on to state that if the structure function claim promotes the product for another use that may involve a physiological effect, then the product may be considered a drug.  This is not a new provision.  Past conversations I have had with current and former FDA staff members indicated that “nutritive value” refers to conventional nutrients such as carbohydrates, fat, protein, fiber, vitamins and minerals. This makes me wonder whether this guidance indicates that FDA objects to claims about gut health and digestive regularity as seen on some yogurt and fermented beverage products.  

FDA issued a draft guidance on liquid supplements in December of 2009.  The 2014 final guidance issued this week is not significantly different from the 2009 draft but does provide some additional detail and clarifying examples.  So how are liquid supplements and beverages differentiated?  The new guidance lists the following criteria to consider when determining the classification of a liquid product for ingestion:

1.    Product labeling and advertising.  If the product is promoted to “refresh” or “rehydrate”, then it is a beverage even if its label includes a supplement facts box.
2.      Product names.  If the product name includes terms such as “beverage”, “drink”, “water” or “soda”, the product is a beverage, not a dietary supplement.  FDA notes that the term “tea” is not used exclusively for beverages; implying that some teas may be dietary supplements but the other criteria must also be considered.
3.      Product packaging size, shape, color, design, whether it is recloseable and the volume it holds is a factor to be considered in classifying a product as a beverage or liquid supplement.
4.      Serving size and recommended intake.  The guidance states that Americans consume about 1.2 liters of water and other beverages daily.  If the serving size of a liquid product makes up a significant portion of 1.2 liters, then the product would be considered a beverage and not a liquid dietary supplement.
5.      Recommendations and directions for use. If a product is recommended to quench thirst, it would be a beverage.  If the directions were similar to ‘take one tablespoon three times per day, it is probably a dietary supplement.
6.      Marketing practices. Advertising that compare the product to other beverages or suggest that it can substitute for a beverage or if metatags are used that bring the product up in searches for beverages, then the product is a beverage and not a dietary supplement.
7.      Composition.  FDA noted that simply adding a dietary ingredient that is only permitted in dietary supplement products to a conventional food does not transform that food into a dietary supplement.  The agency gives the example that adding ginkgo to a conventional beverage does not cause that product to be classified as a dietary supplement.
8.      Other information including information found in patents or filings with the Security and Exchange Commission.

The guidance also states that powders and premixes can be either for beverage or dietary supplement purposes.  It is also important to note that the guidance discusses the fact that food ingredients must be either GRAS (generally recognized as safe) or approved food additives. GRAS ingredients and approved food additives may typically be used in dietary supplements.  However, the caveat is added that these GRAS ingredients and approved additives must be used in accordance with the regulations that stipulate the approved amounts and uses, a condition which is frequently ignored. 

The discussion of GRAS ingredients, approved food additives and dietary ingredients echoes the second guidance document that FDA published on January 13, 2014.  FDA’s purpose in issuing this guidance is “to remind manufacturers and distributors of conventional foods about the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) regarding substances added to conventional foods, including beverages.” The guidance states in part,
“We are concerned that some of the novel substances that are being added to conventional foods, including beverages, may cause the food to be adulterated because these added substances may not be GRAS for their intended use and are not being used in accordance with a food additive regulation prescribing conditions of safe use. In addition, some substances that have been present in the food supply for many years are now being added to conventional foods at levels in excess of their traditional use levels or in new types of conventional foods. This trend raises questions as to whether these higher levels and other new conditions of use are safe.”
My interpretation of this is that FDA is eyeing the growing use of caffeine in a variety of products.  The regulation on the use of caffeine (21 CFR 182.1180) states,
(a) Product. caffeine.
(b) Tolerance. 0.02 percent.
(c) Limitations, restrictions, or explanation. This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in cola-type beverages in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
Clearly there are many products caffeine-containing products on store shelves today are not cola beverages and many contain much more than 0.02% caffeine. 

Similarly there are regulations regarding the fortification of foods and beverages with vitamins (21 CFR 104.20).  This guidance may well serve to remind manufacturers of vitamin-containing drinks and other functional foods and beverages of the restrictions on adding vitamins to those products.

This guidance also notes that binders, excipients and fillers used in dietary supplements must conform to the approved uses for additives or be used in accordance with their GRAS intended uses. 

While FDA states in both of these guidances that they “do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities” I read both guidances as a heads up to industry to review the regulations covering the ingredients used in their products and also to review the classification of any liquid products offered for sale.

It is my hope that you will find these occasional updates helpful. If so, you may use this link http://eepurl.com/Imbjv to subscribe to our occasional email newsletters regarding FDA regulations and other topics of interest to FDA-regulated companies.  We send messages targeted to the dietary supplement, cosmetic, food, OTC drug and medical device industry sectors.  You may subscribe to one or all of the newsletters and you may unsubscribe at any time.

All the best to you!
Evelyn & Associates

Monday, March 21, 2011

Warning Letters: Gelatin and Water as Dietary Ingredients

FDA warning letters continue to provide information that give insight into the level of detail of FDA inspection, which are relatively new to the dietary supplement industry and may help your company avoid problems when your inspection comes up.

In a February 9, 2011 letter to Ancient Formulas of Wichita, Kansas, FDA declared some products misbranded because they did not include a complete list of ingredients.  Specifically the agency noted that the ingredients that make up the capsules were not listed.  Regulations covering ingredient declaration include 21 CFR 101.4, 101.36 and 101.100.  While there are many details in these listings the highlights are as follows:

Ingredients that must be declared:
101.4 (a)(1) Ingredients required to be declared on the label or labeling of a food…shall be listed by common or usual name in descending order of predominance by weight …
101.4 (g) …Ingredients in dietary supplements that are not dietary ingredients or that do not contain dietary ingredients, such as excipients, fillers, artificial colors, artificial sweeteners, flavors, or binders, shall be included in the ingredient list.

Section 101.100 lists ingredients which do not have to be listed: “Incidental additives that are present in a food at insignificant levels and do not have any technical or functional effect in that food.”

In the letter to Ancient Formulas, FDA listed ‘gelatin’ as an example of an undeclared capsule ingredient but depending upon what the capsule supplier lists, there may be need to declare other ingredients.  Softgels often contain colorants and other excipients and most capsules also list water as an ingredient, which should be declared on the label.  

Speaking of water, another dietary supplement manufacturer, Abba Pharmaceuticals of Tampa, Florida, also received a warning letter with the unique citation that they failed to a) establish specifications for water as an ingredient in the liquid dietary supplement product and b) they failed to determine and keep records demonstrating that water used as a dietary supplement ingredient conformed with local, State and Federal regulations and would not contaminate the dietary supplement. (21 CFR 111.15 & 111.23).

Many of you have heard me say that a product label is really a table of contents of how the product was manufactured.  They way ingredients are declared describes how those ingredients were added and mixed. When reviewing your labels, the team at Bioscience Translation & Application looks beyond the label itself to alert you to the regulatory implications for your manufacturing process.  The warning letters discussed above provide examples of why this is important.  Let us help you ensure that your labels are correct and that your processes are FDA compliant.

To read the warning letters in their entirety, visit http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/default.htm#browse and search on the company names.  To read the regulations cited above, search using the section numbers cited at  http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm .

We send targeted email newsletters to various groups of our clients.  To receive newsletters on topics such as foods, cosmetics, drugs, dietary supplements and medical devices, leave a comment to this blog post with your email address (your email address will not be posted to the public).


Thursday, March 3, 2011

Liquid and Semi-solid Foods and Dietary Supplements

On March 3, 2011 FDA published a final rule that amended 21CFR 113, which regulates ‘thermally processed low acid canned foods in hermetically sealed containers” to allow the use of ‘temperature indicator devices’ other than mercury filled glass thermometers.  So why am I telling you about this?  Partly because what the agency calls ‘canned foods’, which brings to mind metal containers and possibly glass jars, also refers to other aseptically processed foods and beverages. But I tell you about this mostly because this modernization from mercury filled glass thermometers is not the agency’s only recent alertness to this general sector of regulations. You see, the sister regulations for ‘thermally processed low acid canned foods’ are regulations covering the production of ‘acidified foods’-- foods which are not aseptically processed because their pH is low enough to prevent spoilage.

So what?  Well, you and I and FDA have noticed many more liquid dietary supplements in the marketplace.  Most contain acid ingredients and therefore are acidified foods. However, not all manufacturers comply with the regulations of 21CFR114, which require that they register their facilities as acid food producers and file the processes by which they assure that the product will not spoil and cause public harm. This registration is separate from the more generic food facility registration. I wrote about this once before in November of 2010 but I am raising the issue again because I continue to see liquid dietary supplements that have acidic components added to them but whose processes have not be filed with FDA.  Because this regulation is important for ensuring the safety of public health, any violation could cause your company to have to cease production until FDA approves your process and your entire Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) program. 

I am also concerned about these sister regulations because I have seen a number of liquid ‘alkalinizing’ products on the market—they too would fall under one of these sets of regulations.  The guidance documents for these regulations are really hard to find on the FDA website and an FDA staffer in the office of Low Acid Canned Foods agreed that the regulations are difficult to understand; none the less, if you are producing a liquid or semi-solid product that is preserved in any way, you probably need to pay attention to this. 

If you have any doubt about which regulations apply to your products, contact us by leaving a comment. We are here help.
If you know what regulations apply to your product but need help complying with them—let us know.