Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

FDA Update on Importing Cosmetics



FDA recently updated the web page, “Information for Cosmetic Importers.”  This document uses a question and answer format and the update offers some clarification on the use of INCI (International Nomenclature Cosmetic Ingredient) names for cosmetic ingredients:

Is INCI nomenclature acceptable for identifying botanical ingredients?
INCI (International Nomenclature Cosmetic Ingredient) names for botanical ingredients typically use Latin names for genus and species to identify botanical ingredients. U.S. regulations require the use of common or usual names. Latin terms may be included parenthetically following the common or usual name of an ingredient. Example: Aloe (Aloe Barbadensis) Extract. See “FDA Response to CTFA Requests Regarding Harmonization of Ingredient Names (Color Additives, Denatured Alcohol, and Plant Extracts).”

It is very helpful to have this information spelled out by the agency since previously I and others have received conflicting information from the agency on the use of INCI names.

The related topic of C.I. numbers (used in European labeling) is also covered in the update:

Are C.I. numbers acceptable for identifying color additives on cosmetic labeling?
C.I. numbers are not acceptable on product labeling unless they are preceded by the color additive names accepted in the U.S. followed by the C.I. number in parentheses. In addition, C.I. numbers do not indicate FDA approval or FDA color certification. To learn more, see “Color Additives and Cosmetics” and the additional resources listed on that page.

Unfortunately, FDA has not been able to provide true clarity for what ingredients are and are not allowed in cosmetic ingredients.  The import update states that not all ingredients permitted use in cosmetics sold outside the US are permitted in the US and links to a very short list of prohibited ingredients.  But the update goes on to state, “But remember, any ingredient is prohibited if it causes the finished cosmetic product to be unsafe for consumers under labeled or customary conditions for use, even if there is no regulation specifically prohibiting or restricting its use in cosmetics.”  The associated link leads the reader to the brief list of prohibited ingredients and this Q&A:

Are these the only ingredients that can cause a product to become violative?

No. A product may become adulterated or misbranded in a number of ways. Among these are improperly used color additives or any ingredient, other than a coal-tar hair dye, that causes a cosmetic to be harmful under customary or usual conditions of use, or cause a cosmetic to become misbranded, as stated in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Sections 601 and 602. Additionally, an ingredient having a history of use in or as a cosmetic may at any time have its safety brought into question by new information.

So what is a cosmetic importer to do to determine whether an ingredient is permitted in the US?  Associates at Bioscience Translation &Application and FDALabels.com search various references and databases for safety information to provide guidance on levels of ingredients that are likely to be considered safe by FDA when reviewing cosmetic formulations for clients.  We are ready to help you with your questions about this or our other regulatory affairs services.

These blog pots are also sent as Informational emails to our subscribers.  If you would like to subscribe to our periodic updates on foods, dietary supplements or over the counter drugs, reply to this post.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Adverse Event Webinar and Other Useful Information for the Dietary Supplement Industry



Here’s hoping that the first month of 2013 has been a good one for you!  Thanks to our many valued clients, the year is off to a good start for our team. Our goal is to help your company comply with applicable FDA regulations. Accordingly, the team at FDALabels.com and Bioscience Translation & Application try to bring useful information to our clients.  Today we have several things for you:
  1. A Free Webinar from Natural Products Insider on Adverse Event Reporting for the Dietary Supplement Industry is set for February 5th.  This is a very important topic for every company that has its name on a dietary supplement product able. You can visit the following webpage for more information and a link to registration. http://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/articles/2013/01/keeping-aer-requirements-in-focus.aspx
  2. More free information for Dietary Supplement companies can be found at http://www.sidiworkgroup.com/. The Standardized Information on Dietary Ingredients (SIDI) Working Group is an association of trade groups that has put together very helpful information on complying with FDA regulations.  The home page (link provided above) has a new publication on how to ‘qualify’ your ingredient or product supplier. Supplier qualification programs are necessary so that you can determine how reliable the supplier is likely to be and whether or not you will get the ingredients or final product you have specified. You can also find links to sample certificates of analysis and  product information data sheets.  It is important to have and know how to use this information for each ingredient used in your products.  The site also includes other useful information on their FAQ page.
  3. Thursday, January 31, 2013 is the deadline for registering any facilities that warehouse or manufacture dietary supplements and foods.  ALL facilities MUST re-register by the 31st unless your original registration was after October 2012.  Visit this site to register: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/RegistrationofFoodFacilities/default.htm.  FDA has provided some additional information on this topic:
Now Available: New FAQs Concerning Food Facility Registration
Please note the addition of two new FAQs concerning the renewal process:

IC.3.26 I do not have the Food Facility Registration PIN number that is required to access my registration in the online registration system, and therefore I am unable to renew my registration. What steps should I take?
Due to certain confidentiality constraints and the amount of time it takes the Agency to process PIN requests, the Agency is no longer able to fulfill PIN requests for registration renewals for the 2012 renewal period. If a facility is unable to renew its existing registration by January 31, 2013 because it does not have its PIN number, the facility may create a new registration by January 31, 2013 in order to be registered in accordance with section 415 of the FD&C Act.

IC.3.27 If I create a new registration, will I retain my compliance history or shipping history associated with my facility?
Some facilities may create new registrations rather than renew existing registrations because they no longer have the PIN numbers that are needed to access their existing registrations in the online registration system. For such a facility, the Agency does not anticipate a loss of compliance history or shipping history, provided that the facility’s new registration includes the same information such as facility name and facility address.
Please see the FSMA Registration page for additional resources.


It is our sincere hope that you will find this information helpful. Please feel free to forward this email to others who may be interested and please always contact us with any questions you may have.Visit our websites: www.BioTransApp.com and www.FDALabels.com to learn more about our services.  You may also reply to this post to be added to our newsletter distribution list.

Regards,
Evelyn

Friday, December 14, 2012

Food Facility Registration and Biennial Registration Renewal



Hello!



If you are crunched for time during this end of year holiday season, this may be good news from FDA:
In 2003 food and dietary supplement facilities were required to register with FDA. Re-registration or renewal was only required when information about the facility changed. As part of the Food Safety and Modernization Act enacted on January 4, 2011, a new biennial renewal requirement was established and all facilities were to renew their registration by December 31, 2012.  FDA was slow to establish a system to handle the renewals and this week FDA extended the deadline to January 31, 2013 for all food and dietary supplement facilities to renew their registration. 


All foreign and domestic facilities that manufacture or hold food or dietary supplements for sale in the US market must submit the following information:

  • Facility name, address, phone number, and emergency contact phone number;
  • Parent company name, address, and phone number (if applicable);
  • Name, address, and phone number of the owner, operator, or agent in charge;
  • Email address for the contact person of the facility or, in case of a foreign facility, the U.S. Agent for the facility;
  • All trade names the facility uses;
  • Applicable food product categories, as listed on the registration form;
  • Name, address, and phone number of a foreign facility’s U.S. agent, and phone number of the facility’s emergency contact if it is someone other than the U.S. agent;
  • Certification that the information submitted is true and accurate and that the person submitting the registration is authorized to do so; and
  • Assurance that FDA will be permitted to inspect the facility at the times and in the manner permitted by the FD&C Act.



There is no fee for registration and it can be done online (at Food Facility Registration or using paper or CD-ROM (see Paper or CD Registration).



A helpful set of questions and answers regarding food facility registration is available at Facility Registration Q&A


All of us at FDALabels.com and Bioscience Translation & Application wish you a joyous holiday season and a great year in 2013.
If you would like to subscribe to our FDA update newsletters, please reply to this post.

Regards,
Evelyn

Monday, December 3, 2012

Wrinkles and FDA Cosmetic Update



It has been many months since we’ve posted anything on cosmetic regulations. This edition is to make you aware of recent FDA enforcement actions and some proposed legislation that you should be aware of.

We have had discussions with many of our clients about ‘wrinkle claims’.  Typically we note that cosmetic regulations allow claims regarding how a product cleanses, beautifies, promotes attractiveness, or alters appearance or fragrance and that claims about wrinkle reduction are therapeutic or drug claims.  Many of you have responded with questions similar to ‘what about all the big guys and the stuff they say in their commercials?’  Well, a few of the big guys received warning letters from FDA regarding their claims.

In October FDA sent Avon a warning letter regarding claims made on their website about their Anew line of products. The letter lists a number of claims including
“Rebuild collagen to help plump out lines and wrinkles.
Stimulate elastin to help improve elasticity and resilience.
Regenerate hydroproteins to help visibly minimize creasing.”
The letter also notes claims comparing Avon products to botox and goes on to say, “Your products are not generally recognized among qualified experts as safe and effective for the above referenced uses and, therefore, the products are new drugs as defined in section 201(p) of the [Food Drug and Cosmetic] Act.”

In September LancĂ´me also received a warning letter noting numerous drug claims on their Genefique line of products.  While one claim cited in the letter did discuss wrinkles, “See significant deep wrinkle reduction in UV damaged skin, clinically proven,” the LancĂ´me website claimed that their products stimulate stem cells.  It may be that it was the stem cell claims that prompted FDA to act but the fact that wrinkle claims were also cited is noteworthy.

Cosmetics may be promoted to reduce the appearance of wrinkles but not to repair, correct, plump or make them go away.

Now for the future: Last April US Congressman Leonard Lance of New Jersey introduced a Bill in the US House of Representatives.  The Cosmetic Safety Amendments Act of 2012 proposes “to establish new procedures and requirements for the registration of the cosmetic product manufacturing establishments, the submission of cosmetic product and ingredient statements, and the reporting of serious and unexpected cosmetic product adverse events, and for other purposes.” 

For a number of years FDA has had the Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program (VCRP) in place.  This program is ‘regulations light’ but mirrors the drug listing and registration program.  I have heard rumors that cosmetic good manufacturing practice regulations have been written but have not seen them published this year; which is not surprising since much in government was on hold in 2012 due to the Presidential election and remains on hold awaiting the outcome of Congressional efforts to address looming budget cuts and tax changes. Nevertheless, it is important for cosmetic companies to be aware that they will be affected by future increased regulation.

To read an intelligent and information article about the legislation, visit FDALawBlog at http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/2012/04/representative-leonard-lance-r-nj-introduces-industry-supported-bill-to-modernize-cosmetics-regulation.htmlhttp://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/2012/04/representative-leonard-lance-r-nj-introduces-industry-supported-bill-to-modernize-cosmetics-regulation.html


I hope you find these periodic posts informative and interesting.  If you  would like to be added to our newsletter distribution list, please reply to this post. 

Contact us with any questions you have regarding cosmetic, food or dietary supplement regulations.